Мы говорим по-русски
Decisions · 604 U.S. 6 (2024)

Bouarfa v. Mayorkas

The Supreme Court held that revocation under 8 U.S.C. §1155 is discretionary and falls within the judicial-review bar in §1252(a)(2)(B)(ii), including the revocation at issue following a sham-marriage determination.

Published: Event / decision date:

Scope and practical distinction

An approved petition is not irrevocable. The case concerns review of revocation under §1155, not every initial petition denial or every agency action. Identify the exact decision and applicable review provisions.

Before relying on this reference

This describes the cited authority or dated action, not a prediction or certification of every later court ruling. Read the full source, determine the governing jurisdiction and check subsequent treatment before relying on it.

Primary sources

General reference information, not legal advice. A summary does not replace the statute or full decision. Check applicability and subsequent developments before filing. Publication does not imply attorney legal review or create an attorney-client relationship.

Frequently asked questions

What is Bouarfa v. Mayorkas?

The Supreme Court held that revocation under 8 U.S.C. §1155 is discretionary and falls within the judicial-review bar in §1252(a)(2)(B)(ii), including the revocation at issue following a sham-marriage determination.

What should I check before relying on this information?

This describes the cited authority or dated action, not a prediction or certification of every later court ruling. Read the full source, determine the governing jurisdiction and check subsequent treatment before relying on it.

Book a Consultation