The Supreme Court held that application of the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship standard for cancellation of removal is a mixed question of law and fact reviewable under INA §242(a)(2)(D).
Review of the mixed question is deferential; factual findings remain distinct from legal questions. The ruling does not grant cancellation or make every discretionary judgment reviewable.
This describes the cited authority or dated action, not a prediction or certification of every later court ruling. Read the full source, determine the governing jurisdiction and check subsequent treatment before relying on it.
Supreme Court of the United States
General reference information, not legal advice. A summary does not replace the statute or full decision. Check applicability and subsequent developments before filing. Publication does not imply attorney legal review or create an attorney-client relationship.
The Supreme Court held that application of the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship standard for cancellation of removal is a mixed question of law and fact reviewable under INA §242(a)(2)(D).
This describes the cited authority or dated action, not a prediction or certification of every later court ruling. Read the full source, determine the governing jurisdiction and check subsequent treatment before relying on it.