Decisions · 602 U.S. 447 (2024)

Campos-Chaves v. Garland

The Supreme Court held that receiving the required later notice of the missed hearing can defeat rescission based solely on an initial notice to appear lacking time and place.

Published: Event / decision date:

Scope and practical distinction

The statutory notice ground for rescission depends on the notices actually received. Do not confuse in-absentia rescission with the stop-time rule addressed in Pereira and Niz-Chavez, or assume every defective notice produces the same result.

Before relying on this reference

This describes the cited authority or dated action, not a prediction or certification of every later court ruling. Read the full source, determine the governing jurisdiction and check subsequent treatment before relying on it.

Primary sources

General reference information, not legal advice. A summary does not replace the statute or full decision. Check applicability and subsequent developments before filing. Publication does not imply attorney legal review or create an attorney-client relationship.

Frequently asked questions

What is Campos-Chaves v. Garland?

The Supreme Court held that receiving the required later notice of the missed hearing can defeat rescission based solely on an initial notice to appear lacking time and place.

What should I check before relying on this information?

This describes the cited authority or dated action, not a prediction or certification of every later court ruling. Read the full source, determine the governing jurisdiction and check subsequent treatment before relying on it.

Book a Consultation