Decisions · 567 U.S. 387 (2012)

Arizona v. United States

The Supreme Court found several provisions of Arizona S.B. 1070 preempted by federal immigration law. It did not facially invalidate the status-check provision, while leaving questions about implementation open.

Published:

Scope and purpose

The challenged provisions concerned registration documents, unauthorized work, state arrests and status checks. The opinion distinguishes state enforcement measures from federal statutory authority and discretion; it is not an adjudication of an individual benefit application.

Related rules and practical context

The decision provides federal-state context for residents of California and Florida as well as other states. It does not decide personal immigration status or prohibit every form of state cooperation. Later legislation and judicial authority may affect a particular issue.

Primary sources

General reference information, not legal advice. A summary does not replace the statute or full decision. Check applicability and subsequent developments before filing. Publication does not imply attorney legal review or create an attorney-client relationship.

Frequently asked questions

What is Arizona v. United States?

The Supreme Court found several provisions of Arizona S.B. 1070 preempted by federal immigration law. It did not facially invalidate the status-check provision, while leaving questions about implementation open.

What should I check before relying on this information?

The decision provides federal-state context for residents of California and Florida as well as other states. It does not decide personal immigration status or prohibit every form of state cooperation. Later legislation and judicial authority may affect a particular issue.

Book a Consultation